Abortion Counseling as Vice Activity: The Free Speech Implications of Rust v. Sullivan and Planned Parenthood v. Casey

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)

Almost ten years after the landmark decision in Roe v. Wade [5] (1973) the battle over abortion [6] was still being waged. The reproductive rights [7] of women in the United States were being challenged by the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 [8]. The act was comprised of four provisions that restricted the fundamental right a woman had to obtaining an abortion [6], as established in R...

Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.

Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.

In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, a bare majority of the Supreme Court reaffirmed Roe v. Wade. Although Roe was not directly implicated by any of the statutes challenged in Casey, all of which could have been upheld without overruling Roe, the Justices agreed to reexamine Roe because of the uncertainty regarding its continued viability and the need to provide guidance...

Con law is as con law does: a survey of Planned Parenthood v. Casey in the state and federal courts.

Rust v. Sullivan and the control of knowledge.

Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, First Amendment Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Health and Medical Administration Commons, Health Policy Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, M...